Reason No. 1:

The List

The List

Download a printable version of this list by clicking on the button to the right

111 Reasons Why You Should Suspect that

We are Being Covid19 Scammed:

Statistical Related Reasons:
  • The numbers from the CDC record that this virus outbreak is no more deadly than the seasonal flu. Link1 Link2

  • No increase in annual deaths despite media hype. Link1

  • The chance of surviving the coronavirus has over 97% survivability rate per the CDC. Link1 Link2 Link3

  • Manipulation of Statistics. Link1

Science Related Reasons:
  • The CDC has claimed that there has been no scientific study that proves the existence of the COVID-19 strain. Link1 Link2 

  • If there is no verifiably isolated COVID-19 strain, there can be no vaccine created since the strain has to be used to create the antibodies.  

  • From above, the vaccine is not really a vaccine and so it was not created to provide immunity to the COVID19 strain which has not been isolated. Link1 

  • The above fact prompts us to ask, “What exactly is the function of the COVID-19 vaccine?” Link1

  • If not truly a vaccine then perhaps this drug/injection serves as a medical treatment, in which case, it should be used on people with actual symptoms.

  • People (sick and healthy) are being coerced to take this “medical treatment."

  • The benefits of the treatment, which is not really a vaccine, are minimal and authorities admit to this.

  • They admit to no guarantee of protection from catching Covid after receiving the injection.

  • They admit to no guarantee that you will not spread a virus after being vaccinated.

  • In spite of of the previous facts, the establishment still encourages the need for additional shots and ever-increasing numbers of new “vaccines” that would be required on a regular basis to prevent illness from more and more strains.

  • If the first strain was not isolated then how can we be assured that these “new strains” even exist. Link1 

  • A need for continuous shots would turn each and every citizen into a chronic patient who would require constant pharmaceutical treatments instead of relying on the innate immune system bestowed upon us all at birth.

  • Since the establishment admits that the injection is not really a vaccine, then taking continuous vaccines to prevent dying from strains of viruses not even isolated makes no sense at all.

  • This injection is experimental since it has not been time tested through the normal scientific methods. Link1 

  • This injection is not approved by the FDA since it is experimental and not properly tested. Link1 

  • This injection has a high likely hood of making you sick, with a list of many possible side effects and adverse effects. Link 1 Link2 Link3 Link4 Link5 Link6 

  • The establishment insists the injection is safe but there is absolutely no long term studies done on the safety of this treatment. Link1 Link2 Link3

  • This injection has a higher chance of side effects including death than catching Covid-19. Link1 Link2 Link3

  • It is deceptive and inaccurate for the establishment to claim that a drug is safe when there have been no long term studies carried out on the drugs.

  • In trials with mRNA vaccinated animals who were later exposed to the coronavirus, a considerable percentage of the animals died. Scientists predict the same results in humans and evidence suggests that we are already starting to see this happen. Link1 

  • Many scientists are concerned about the mRNA long term results and consider this injection to be gene modification. They are concerned about the push to mass vaccinate and the underlying intent behind such modification. Link1 Link2 Link3 Link4 Link5 Link6 Link7 

  • In all other outbreak scenarios, we Isolate the sick, not the healthy.

  • Moderna admits in its white papers that their injection has the risk to “permanently change a person’s DNA.” 

  • Moderna was bankrupt. They never created products or vaccines for humans before. How can we trust them with a challenging vaccine? Link1 Link2 Link3

Alternative Treatments:
  • Corona virus has successfully been treated in India, Mexico, Sweden, Germany, France, and select trials around the world using Ivermectin. Link1 

  • It has also been treated with hydroxychloroquine, zinc and azithromycin.

  • Lysine has now been found to be a treatment for COVID19.

  • Sunshine (and Vitamin D) and fresh air have been proven to boost natural immunity. Link1 

  • The lockdowns and masks prevent access to sunshine and fresh air thereby inhibiting immune function. Link1 Link2

  • Time tested herbal treatments and vitamin/mineral supplements boost the immunity and help to prevent infection and inflammation response.

  • Human touch, kindness and social interaction are known to increase immunity and well being thereby providing a natural resistance to illness.

  • The lockdowns and social distancing prevent these crucial human interactions from taking place. Link1 

  • Energy medicine, naturopathic procedures, acupuncture, chiropractic, massage, and regular exercise increase overall health by increasing crucial energy flow in the body, eliminating blockages of flow, oxygenating the blood, invigorating the overall tissue and organ vitality thereby increasing immunity and healing the body when sick.

  • The lockdowns and social distancing closed up shops of practitioners, gym owners and doctors thereby preventing access to these vital effective treatments.

  • The truth about Herd Immunity. Link 1

Economic Reasons:
  • The Economy has never before been shut down during an epidemic, much less the entire world.

  • Disaster Capitalism. Link1

  • Small shop owners were discouraged from opening and forced to impose draconian measures on their patrons while the large corporations were allowed to provide services.

  • The Individuals and Groups that have created and continue to sustain the global narrative will prosper from a pandemic since many of them own patents connected to aspects of this agenda and some are invested in companies like pharmaceuticals, large departments stores, mask companies, testing, equipment, etc. that are profiting from COVID19. Link1 Link2 Link3 Link4 Link5 Link6 Link7 

Political/Control Related Reasons:
  • Pharmaceutical companies, politicians, medical establishment, universities and the media appear to have joined forces in the creation of an “official” narrative for COVID19 and its vaccine roll-out. Link1 Link2 Link3 Link4 Link5 Link6 Link7 Link8 Link9 

  • This same group continually manipulates the populace into fear in order to persuade them to follow the narrative. Link1 Link2 Link3 

  • This same group continually manipulates the populace into anger and encourages people to coerce and police their fellow citizens endorsing shame and force as a form of punishment for not going along with the narrative.

  • This same group has employed technological means and high tech Hollywood special effects to use the media to continually hide the truth about death rates, actual medical facts, and adverse reactions. Link1 Link2 

  • In October of 2019, a corona virus outbreak simulation called Event 201 was preplanned and held in New York. Sponsored by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, this event simulation was a “disaster drill” of sorts that completely mirrored the actual “surprise” pandemic that followed months later. Link1

  • During Event 201, much emphasis was put on how the governmental, health, and corporate power structures could control the narrative and market their “pandemic plan.” Link1 Link2

  • Internet Search Engines and Social Media Outlets connected to Government Agencies have deliberately eliminated  the availability of websites, books, virtual information and information sharing that presents alternative facts and info (Cyber Book Burning).

  • Anyone or any Group that presents information, studies, statistics, evidence, etc. that offer up alternative views to that narrative are discredited, subject to censorship, often dismissed from positions and sometimes threatened. Link1 Link2 

  • Many doctors presenting successful COVID19 treatments have been censored and labeled as “propaganda” while the vaccine was posed as the only solution to Covid-19. Link1 

  • The executives and board members at Pfizer are on record that they have not taken their own treatment, despite all the fanfare and assurances. They are claiming that they would consider it unfair to “cut the line”. Why would billionaires with private jets, yachts, and private islands all of a sudden decide it is generous to wait in line for something that they truly desire?

  • Israel is being used as a guinea pig to implement vaccine apartheid and the agenda to isolate and punish the unvaccinated. The goal is to perfect the apartheid there and then spread throughout the globe. Link1 Link2 Link3 Link4 

  • Vaccine Travel Passports. Link1 Link2 Link3 Link4 Link5 Link6 Link7  

  • Intended future Vaccine Food Passports/scans. Link1

  • Intended future Vaccine buy/sell requirements. Link1 Link2 

  • Rules and regulations are vague from city to city, state to state and country to country. Some things are mandated and some are suggested but often times strict regulations are enforced even if they are not necessarily mandated.

  • As our rights are being stripped, it is hard to tell what the local and national governments really can and cannot do. Link1

  • Those in charge of enforcing these vague rules are confused and as a result, people are being treated badly if they even try to do anything counter to the stringent “rules.” Link1 Link2 

Legal Reasons:
  • A mandate is NOT a law. 

  • The vaccine legally cannot be called a vaccine – it is EXPERIMENTAL GENE THERAPY. Link1

  • Deaths resulting from the injection are not covered by many life insurance companies because it is considered experimental so by consenting to take the “experimental” vaccine, very often you waive your right for insurance payout.

  • Pharmaceutical companies have no liability if illness, handicap or death result from the vaccine/injection. They cannot be sued. Link1 Link2

  • Any lawsuits for vaccine injury since 1986 have resulted in capped compensations that are paid out by the government with tax payer money. The Pharmaceutical companies themselves cannot be sued.

  • Politicians are immune to liability as well.

  • Through the recent PREP Act immunity is also given to prescribers, administrators, program planners, and all agents involved with development and distribution of Covid-19 Experimental Therapy. Link1

  • It takes time to pull together a legal case against institutions, governments, companies, etc. that may be involved in what appears to be an agenda. In the meantime much damage will be done. Link1 

  • Legal problems with corona virus and vaccine patent filings and patents registered prior to the outbreak that incriminate the Pharmaceutical companies and Health Institutions. Link1 

Crimes Against Humanity/Human Rights Abuses Reasons:
  • Drs. and specialists have been censored. Link1 

  • Data and scientific studies have been censored if they do not fit the official agenda.

  • Hospitals and Medical Institutions were receiving money per COVID patient deaths. 

  • As a result, all other causes of death were replaced by COVID per CDC Orders for 2020. Link1

  • It is against the Nuremberg Code to call the vaccine safe – it is called an experimental INJECTION.

  • UN Agenda 21. Link1 Link2 Link3 Link4 Link5  Link6  Link7 Link8 

  • All deaths resulting from policies implemented by politicians and healthcare authorities like putting symptomatic COVID patients in nursing homes near healthy people, insisting on the use of ventilators when it was clear they were doing more harm than good, etc.

  • All the deaths/illnesses resulting from mask wearing when it is clear they do not help.

  • All the deaths/illnesses resulting from taking experimental vaccines/injections. Link1 Link2 Link3 Link4 Link5 

  • All the deaths/illnesses resulting from economic collapse.

  • All the deaths/illnesses resulting from withholding simple, time tested drugs that have been proven to work.

  • All the deaths/illnesses resulting from not allowing credentialed doctors to use these drugs on their patients so that results could be seen over time.

  • Falsifying scientific studies and data to fit the agenda.

  • Evidence of FEMA camps and other determent facilities being prepared to house those who do not comply with the narrative. Link1

  • Medical Mismanagement: Treating all patients with Covid symptoms as actual Covid patients without further testing for other potential causes of their illness.

  • Coerced vaccination of people especially elderly, children, and handicapped. Link1

Social Concerns:
  • People are experiencing mental health and emotional problems due to stress levels, social distancing and isolation.

  • As a result of the above issues, healthy social practices, some based on rich cultural and ethnic traditions are being replaced by practices more akin to some kind of virtual reality as more and more activities are being encouraged through computer.

  • School children are traumatized as their healthy social habits are being replaced by the restrictions being forced upon them in the learning environment.

  • Since the elderly are the most vulnerable group, extreme restrictions have been placed on them. Our seniors are being traumatized as they are isolated from family, friends, grandchildren, etc.

  • The Propaganda Media machine has engaged in psychological manipulation and created social environments where peer pressure from our neighbors and the community have become a norm.

  • The above manipulation is affecting the psychological health of communities, institutions, small businesses and more.

Testing Reasons:
  • India has stopped administering testing since the test kits are off 40% of the time. 

  • Testing of non-humans has resulted in positive results.

  • Corona Virus PCR test inventor, Christian Drosten’s credibility is in question as he is being named in a Class Action Suit. His credentials are in question, his tactics, methods and predictions are faulty and he has many conflicts of interest such as deep connections to the pharmaceutical industry. 

  • Evidence exists that shows the tests produce positive results from a multitude of infections and may have been specifically designed to produce false positives thereby increasing COVID19 cases. Link1  Link2 Link3 Link4

  • The swabs are not sterile cotton swabs. They are specifically manufactured with special lab created artificial fibers.

  • There is evidence to suggest that the test swabs may contain nanoparticles on them. These kinds of particles have been linked to a relatively new disease called morgellons.

Mask Related Reasons:
  • Masks Don’t Work. Link1 Link2 Link3 Link4

  • Masks are completely irrelevant to blocking the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Link1 

  • Doctors describe mask mandates as a “clinical trial.”

  • There is no scientific study to support the efficacy of masks. Link1

  • Direct copy from the package of N95 Masks from 3M reads, “This product...will NOT PROVIDE ANY PROTECTION AGAINST COVID-19 (CORONAVIRUS) OR OTHER VIRUSES OR CONTAMINANTS.” 

  • Also from the 3M mask packaging: “Wearing an ear loop mask does not reduce the risk of contracting any disease or infection.” 

  • Surgeons use masks in the operating room to prevent contamination of open wounds from drops of sweat and saliva.

  • The size of the coronavirus is 1/1000th to an atom. Masks only stop microns larger than the size of 1/100. This is like the size of a pea through a chain link fence.

  • The higher loss of life in the 1918 Spanish influenza outbreak was from bacterial infection from wearing masks which caused and still causes respiratory infections and pneumonia.

  • OSHA whistleblowers have come forward to provide evidence of why the masks do not work and also to stress how incredibly harmful the long term effects of wearing masks are on the public. Link1

Bill Gates Reasons:
  • Bill Gates has said that the best return on investment he ever made was on vaccines. He plans to profit $6.2 trillion. 

  • Bill Gates net worth prior to Covid: 98 billion. Net worth now: $115.8 billion. His true wealth gets hidden as it is much more vast. Link1 Link2

  • Bill Gates Foundation also distributed vaccines all over Africa.

  • The vaccines that Gates helped spread through Africa resulted in paralysis, and infertility.

  • Bill Gates has criminal charges and arrest warrants filed against him in several African countries.

  • Bill Gates is on video talking about reducing the population with vaccines. See population control and UN Agenda 21. Link1

  • Bill Gates is not a Medical Doctor, Doctor of Science, Doctor of Anything and yet, he somehow has become the “expert” on vaccines. Link1

Spiritual Related Reasons:
  • While stadiums remain open and large crowds are allowed to gather to protest officially approved topics, places of worship were closed initially and currently many of these places still have restrictions in place. 

  • There are people who report that post vaccination, they can no longer “feel” God. There is an emotional disconnect described. 

  • In many spiritual groups and texts, there is reference to a great leap in consciousness that occurs at the end of evolutionary cycles called ascension. Some speculate that the controlling groups on this planet have created this hoax to prevent ascension thereby continuing consciousness slavery on the Earth. Link1

  • Given the above statement, it seems that the vaccine may have been created to assist in the actual separation of the lower individual personality from its higher wisdom counterpart. Some spiritual groups refer to that higher wisdom as the soul. Link1 Link2 

More reasons:

More Reasons:


18 Reasons I Won't Be Getting a Covid Vaccine

A few friends have asked my thoughts on the covid jab(s) so I thought it was time to write an article on the topic.

All my friends had not heard most of the details I shared, so I figured you might appreciate hearing some of what I told them.

Knowing how contentious this issue is, part of me would rather just write about something else, but I feel like the discussion/news is so one-sided that I should speak up.

As I always strive to do, I promise to do my best to be level-headed and non-hysterical.

I'm not here to pick a fight with anyone, just to walk you through some of what I've read, my lingering questions, and explain why I can't make sense of these covid vaccines.



If you care to engage on this topic with me, excellent.

Here are the rules...

I am more than happy to correspond with you if...

  1. You are respectful and treat me the way you would want to be treated.

  2. You ask genuinely thoughtful questions about what makes sense to you.

  3. You make your points using sound logic and don't hide behind links or the word "science." In other words, make a kind, level-headed argument (links welcome), but don't just post a link and say "read the science." That's intellectually lazy.

If you do respond, and you break any of those rules, your comments will be ignored/deleted.

With that out of the way, let me say this...

I don't know everything, but so far no one has been able to answer the objections below.

So here are the reasons I'm opting out of the covid vaccine.


The only industry in the world that bears no liability for injuries or deaths resulting from their products, are vaccine makers.

First established in 1986 with the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, and reinforced by the PREP Act, vaccine makers cannot be sued, even if they are shown to be negligent.

The covid-vaccine makers are allowed to create a one-size-fits-all product, with no testing on sub-populations (i.e. people with specific health conditions), and yet they are unwilling to accept any responsibility for any adverse events or deaths their products cause.

If a company is not willing to stand behind their product as safe, especially one they rushed to market and skipped animal trials on, I am not willing to take a chance on their product.

No liability. No trust.

Here's why...


The four major companies who are making these covid vaccines are/have either:

  1. Never brought a vaccine to market before covid (Moderna and Johnson & Johnson).

  2. Are serial felons (Pfizer, and Astra Zeneca).

  3. Are both (Johnson & Johnson).

Moderna had been trying to "Modernize our RNA" (thus the company name)--for years, but had never successfully brought ANY product to market--how nice for them to get a major cash infusion from the government to keep trying.

In fact, all major vaccine makers (save Moderna) have paid out tens of billions of dollars in damages for other products they brought to market when they knew those products would cause injuries and death--see Vioxx, Bextra, Celebrex, Thalidomide, and Opioids as a few examples.

If drug companies willfully choose to put harmful products in the market, when they can be sued, why would we trust any product where they have NO liability?

In case it hasn't sunk in, let me reiterate...3 of the 4 covid vaccine makers have been sued for products they brought to market even though they knew injuries and deaths would result.

Let me reiterate this point:

Given the free pass from liability, and the checkered past of these companies, why would we assume that all their vaccines are safe and made completely above board?

Where else in life would we trust someone with that kind of reputation?

To me that makes as much sense as expecting a remorseless, abusive, unfaithful lover to become a different person because a judge said deep down they are a good person.

No. I don't trust them.

No liability. No trust.

Here's another reason why I don't trust them.


There have been many attempts to make viral vaccines in the past that ended in utter failure, which is why we did not have a coronavirus vaccine in 2020.

In the 1960's, scientists attempted to make an RSV (Respiratory Syncytial Virus) vaccine for infants.

In that study, they skipped animal trials because they weren't necessary back then.

In the end, the vaccinated infants got much sicker than the unvaccinated infants when exposed to the virus in nature, with 80% of the vaccinated infants requiring hospitalization, and two of them died.

After 2000, scientists made many attempts to create coronavirus vaccines.

For the past 20 years, all ended in failure because the animals in the clinical trials got very sick and many died, just like the children in the 1960's.

You can read a summary of this history/science here.

Or if you want to read the individual studies you can check out these links:

  • In 2004 attempted vaccine produced hepatitis in ferrets

  • In 2005 mice and civets became sick and more susceptible to coronaviruses after being vaccinated

  • In 2012 the ferrets became sick and died. And in this study mice and ferrets developed lung disease.

  • In 2016 this study also produce lung disease in mice.

The typical pattern in the studies mentioned above is that the children and the animals produced beautiful antibody responses after being vaccinated.

The manufacturers thought they hit the jackpot.

The problem came when the children and animals were exposed to the wild version of the virus.

When that happened, an unexplained phenomenon called Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE) also known as Vaccine Enhanced Disease (VED) occurred where the immune system produced a "cytokine storm" (i.e. overwhelmingly attacked the body), and the children/animals died.

Here's the lingering issue...

The vaccine makers have no data to suggest their rushed vaccines have overcome that problem.

In other words, never before has any attempt to make a coronavirus vaccine been successful, nor has the gene-therapy technology that is mRNA "vaccines" been safely brought to market, but hey, since they had billions of dollars in government funding, I'm sure they figured that out.

Except they don't know if they have...


When vaccine makers submitted their papers to the FDA for the Emergency Use Authorization (Note: An EUA is not the same as a full FDA approval), among the many "Data Gaps" they reported was that they have nothing in their trials to suggest they overcame that pesky problem of Vaccine Enhanced Disease.

They simply don't know--i.e. they have no idea if the vaccines they've made will also produce the same cytokine storm (and deaths) as previous attempts at such products.

As Joseph Mercola points out...

"Previous attempts to develop an mRNA-based drug using lipid nanoparticles failed and had to be abandoned because when the dose was too low, the drug had no effect, and when dosed too high, the drug became too toxic. An obvious question is: What has changed that now makes this technology safe enough for mass use?"

If that's not alarming enough, here are other gaps in the data--i.e. there is no data to suggest safety or efficacy regarding:

  • Anyone younger than age 18 or older than age 55

  • Pregnant or lactating mothers

  • Auto-immune conditions

  • Immunocompromised individuals

  • No data on transmission of covid

  • No data on preventing mortality from covid

  • No data on duration of protection from covid

Hard to believe right?

In case you think I'm making this up, or want to see the actual documents sent to the FDA by Pfizer and Moderna for their Emergency Use Authorization, you can check out this, or this respectively. The data gaps can be found starting with page 46 and 48 respectively.

For now let's turn our eyes to the raw data the vaccine makers used to submit for emergency use authorization.



Would you like to see the raw data that produced the "90% and 95% effective" claims touted in the news?

Me too...

But they won't let us see that data.

As pointed out in the BMJ, something about the Pfizer and Moderna efficacy claims smells really funny.

There were "3,410 total cases of suspected, but unconfirmed covid-19 in the overall study population, 1,594 occurred in the vaccine group vs. 1,816 in the placebo group."


Did they fail to do science in their scientific study by not verifying a major variable?

Could they not test those "suspected but unconfirmed" cases to find out if they had covid?

Apparently not.

Why not test all 3,410 participants for the sake of accuracy?

Can we only guess they didn't test because it would mess up their "90-95% effective" claims?

Where's the FDA?

Would it not be prudent for the FDA, to expect (demand) that the vaccine makers test people who have "covid-like symptoms," and release their raw data so outside, third-parties could examine how the manufacturers justified the numbers?

I mean it's only every citizen of the world we're trying to get to take these experimental products...

Why did the FDA not require that? Isn't that the entire purpose of the FDA anyway?

Good question.

Foxes guarding the hen house?

Seems like it.

No liability. No trust.


Obviously, with products that have only been on the market a few months, we have no long-term safety data.

In other words, we have no idea what this product will do in the body months or years from now--for ANY population.

Given all the risks above (risks that ALL pharmaceutical products have), would it not be prudent to wait to see if the worst-case scenarios have indeed been avoided?

Would it not make sense to want to fill those pesky "data gaps" before we try to give this to every man, woman, and child on the planet?

Well...that would make sense, but to have that data, they need to test it on people, which leads me to my next point...



What most who are taking the vaccine don't know is that because these products are still in clinical trials, anyone who gets the shot is now part of the clinical trial.

They are part of the experiment.

Those (like me) who do not take it, are part of the control group.

Time will tell how this experiment works out.

But, you may be asking, if the vaccines are causing harm, wouldn't we be seeing that all over the news?

Surely the FDA would step in and pause the distribution?

Well, if the adverse events reporting system was working, maybe things would be different.


According to a study done by Harvard (at the commission of our own government), less than 1% of all adverse reactions to vaccines are actually submitted to the National Vaccine Adverse Events Reports System (VAERS) - read page 6 at the link above.

While the problems with VAERS have not been fixed (as you can read about in this letter to the CDC), at the time of this writing VAERS reports over 2,200 deaths from the current covid vaccines, as well as close to 60,000 adverse reactions.

"VAERS data released today showed 50,861 reports of adverse events following COVID vaccines, including 2,249 deaths and 7,726 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020 and March 26, 2021."

And those numbers don't include (what is currently) 578 cases of Bell's Palsy.

If those numbers are still only 1% of the total adverse reactions (or .8 to 2% of what this study published recently in the JAMA found), you can do the math, but that equates to somewhere around 110,000 to 220,000 deaths from the vaccines to date, and a ridiculous number of adverse reactions.

Bet you didn't see that on the news.

That death number would currently still be lower than the 424,000 deaths from medical errors that happen every year (which you probably also don't hear about), but we are not even six months into the rollout of these vaccines yet.

If you want a deeper dive into the problems with the VAERS reporting system, you can check this out, or check this out.

But then there's my next point, which could be argued makes these covid vaccines seem pointless...


Wait, what?

Aren't these vaccines supposed to be what we've been waiting for to "go back to normal"?


Why do you think we're getting all these conflicting messages about needing to practice social distancing and wear masks AFTER we get a vaccine?

The reason is because these vaccines were never designed to stop transmission OR infection.

If you don't believe me, I refer you again to the papers submitted to the FDA I linked to above.

The primary endpoint (what the vaccines are meant to accomplish) is to lower your symptoms.

Sounds like just about every other drug on the market right?

That's it...lowering your symptoms is the big payoff we've been waiting for.

Does that seem completely pointless to anyone but me?

  1. It can't stop us from spreading the virus.

  2. It can't stop the virus from infecting us once we have it.

  3. To get the vaccine is to accept all the risk of these experimental products and the best it might do is lower symptoms?

Heck, there are plenty of other things I can do to lower my symptoms that don't involve taking what appears to be a really risky product.

Now for the next logical question:

If we're worried about asymptomatic spreaders, would the vaccine not make it more likely that we are creating asymptomatic spread?

If it indeed reduces symptoms, anyone who gets it might not even know they are sick and thus they are more likely to spread the virus, right?

For what it's worth, I've heard many people say the side effects of the vaccine (especially the second dose) are worse than catching covid.

I can't make sense of that either.

Take the risk.

Get no protection.

Suffer through the vaccine side-effects.

Keep wearing your mask and social distancing...

And continue to be able to spread the virus.


It gets worse.


Talk about a bummer.

You get vaccinated and you still catch covid.

In reality, this phenomenon is probably happening everywhere, but those are the ones making the news now.

Given the reasons above (and what's below), maybe this doesn't surprise you, but bummer if you thought the vaccine was a shield to keep you safe.

It's not.

That was never the point.

If 66% of healthcare workers in L.A. are going to delay or skip the vaccine...maybe they aren't wowed by the rushed science either.

Maybe they are watching the shady way deaths and cases are being reported...


According to the CDC's own numbers, covid has a 99.74% survival rate.

Why would I take a risk on a product, that doesn't stop infection or transmission, to help me overcome a cold that has a .26% chance of killing me--actually in my age range is has about a .1% chance of killing me (and .01% chance of killing my kids), but let's not split hairs here.

With a bar (death rate) that low, we will be in lockdown every year...i.e. forever.

But wait, what about the 500,000 plus deaths, that's alarming right?

I'm glad you asked.


Something smells really funny about this one.

Never before in the history of death certificates has our own government changed how deaths are reported.

Why now, are we reporting everyone who dies with covid in their body, as having died of covid, rather than the co-morbidities that actually took their life?

Until covid, all coronaviruses (common colds) were never listed as the primary cause of death when someone died of heart disease, cancer, diabetes, auto-immune conditions, or any other major co-morbidity.

The disease was listed as the cause of death, and a confounding factor like flu or pneumonia was listed on a separate line.

To bloat the number even more, both the W.H.O. and the C.D.C. changed their guidelines such that those who are suspected or probable (but were never confirmed) of having died of covid, are also included in the death numbers.


If we are going to do that then should we not go back and change the numbers of all past cold and flu seasons so we can compare apples to apples when it comes to death rates?

According to the CDCs own numbers, (scroll down to the section "Comorbidities and other conditions") only 6% of the deaths being attributed to covid are instances where covid seems to be the only issue at hand.

In other words, reduce the death numbers you see on the news by 94% and you have what is likely the real numbers of deaths from just covid.

Even if the former CDC director is correct and covid-19 was a lab-enhanced virus (see Reason #14 below), a .26% death rate is still in line with the viral death rate that circles the planet ever year.

Then there's this Fauci guy.

I'd really love to trust him, but besides the fact that he hasn't treated one covid should probably know...



Thanks to the Bayh-Dole Act, government workers are allowed to file patents on any research they do using tax payer funding.

Tony Fauci owns over 1,000 patents (see this video for more details), including patents being used on the Moderna vaccine...which he approved government funding for.

In fact, the NIH (which NIAID is part of) claims joint ownership of Moderna's vaccine.

Does anyone else see this as a MAJOR conflict of interest, or criminal even?

I say criminal because there's also this pesky problem that makes me even more distrustful of Fauci, NIAD, and the NIH in general.


What is "Gain-of-Function" research?

It's where scientists attempt to make viruses gain functions--i.e. make them more transmissible and deadlier.

Sounds at least a touch unethical, right?

How could that possibly be helpful?

Our government agreed, and banned the practice.

So what did the Fauci-led NIAID do?

They pivoted and outsourced the gain-of-function research (in coronaviruses no less) to China--to the tune of a $600K grant.

You can see more details, including the important timeline of these events in this fantastically well-researched documentary.

Mr. Fauci, you have some explaining to do...and I hope the cameras are recording when you have to defend your actions.

For now, let's turn our attention back to the virus...


Not only does the virus (like all viruses) continue to mutate, but according to world-renowned vaccine developer Geert Vanden Bossche (who you'll meet below if you don't know him) it's mutating about every 10 hours.

How in the world are we going to keep creating vaccines to keep up with that level of mutation?

We're not.

Might that also explain why fully vaccinated people are continuing to catch covid?

Why, given that natural immunity has never ultimately failed humanity, do we suddenly not trust it?

Why, if I ask questions like the above, or post links like what you find above, will my thoughts be deleted from all major social media platforms?

That brings me to the next troubling problem I have with these vaccines.


I can't help but get snarky here, so humor me.

How did you enjoy all those nationally and globally-televised, robust debates put on by public health officials, and broadcast simultaneously on every major news station?

Wasn't it great hearing from the best minds in medicine, virology, epidemiology, economics, and vaccinology from all over the world as they vigorously and respectfully debated things like:

  • Lockdowns

  • Mask wearing

  • Social-distancing

  • Vaccine efficacy and safety trials

  • How to screen for susceptibility to vaccine injury

  • Therapeutics, (i.e. non-vaccine treatment options)

  • Wasn't it great seeing public health officials (who never treated anyone with covid) have their "science" questioned?

Wasn't it great seeing the FDA panel publicly grill the vaccine makers in prime time as they stood in the hot-seat of tough questions about products of which they have no liability?

Oh, didn't see those debates?

No, you didn't...because they never happened.

What happened instead was heavy-handed censorship of all but one narrative.

Ironically, Mark Zuckerberg can question vaccine safety, but I can't?


When did the first amendment become a suggestion?

It's the FIRST amendment Mark--the one our founders thought was most important.

With so much at stake, why are we fed only one narrative...shouldn't many perspectives be heard and professionally debated?



What has happened to the scientific method of always challenging our assumptions?

What happened to lively debate in this country, or at least in Western society?

Why did anyone who disagrees with the WHO, or the CDC get censored so heavily?

Is the science of public health a religion now, or is science supposed to be about debate?

If someone says "the science is settled" that's how I know I'm dealing with someone who is closed minded.

By definition science (especially biological science) is never settled.

If it was, it would be dogma, not science.

OK, before I get too worked up, let me say this...


I really do.

If lockdowns work, I want to do my part and stay home.

If masks work, I want to wear them.

If social distancing is effective, I want to comply.

But, if there is evidence they don't (masks for example), I want to hear that evidence too.

If highly-credentialed scientists have different opinions, I want to know what they think.

I want a chance to hear their arguments and make up my own mind.

I don't think I'm the smartest person in the world, but I think I can think.

Maybe I'm weird, but if someone is censored, then I REALLY want to hear what they think.

Don't you?

To all my friends who don't have a problem with censorship, will you have the same opinion when what you think is censored?

Is censorship not the technique of dictators, tyrants, and greedy, power-hungry people?

Is it not a sign that those who are doing the censoring know it's the only way they can win?

What if a man who spent his entire life developing vaccines was willing to put his entire reputation on the line and call on all global leaders to immediately stop the covid vaccines because of problems with the science?

What if he pleaded for an open-scientific debate on a global stage?

Would you want to hear what he has to say?

Would you want to see the debate he's asking for?


Here is what may be the biggest reason this covid vaccine doesn't make sense to me.

When someone who is very pro-vaccine, who has spent his entire professional career overseeing the development of vaccines, is shouting from the mountaintops that we have a major problem, I think the man should be heard.

In case you missed it, and in case you care to watch it, here is Geert Vanden Bossche, explaining:

  1. Why the covid vaccine may be putting so much pressure on the virus that we are accelerating it's ability to mutate and become more deadly.

  2. Why the covid vaccines may be creating vaccine-resistant viruses (similar to anti-biotic resistant bacteria).

  3. Why, because of previous problems with Antibody Dependent Enhancement, we may be looking at a mass casualty event in the next few months/years.

If you want to see/read about a second, and longer, interview with Vanden Bossche, where he was asked some tough questions, you can check this out.

If half of what he says comes true, these vaccines could be the worst invention of all time.

If you don't like his science, take it up with him.

I'm just the messenger.

But I can also speak to covid personally.


I didn't enjoy it.

It was a nasty cold for two days:

  • Unrelenting butt/low-back aches

  • Very low energy.

  • Low-grade fever.

It was weird not being able to smell anything for a couple days.

A week later, coffee still tasted a little "off."

But I survived.

Now it appears (as it always has) that I have beautiful, natural, life-long immunity...

...not something likely to wear off in a few months if I get the vaccine.

In my body, and my household, covid is over.

In fact, now that I've had it, there is evidence the covid vaccine might actually be more dangerous for me.

That is not a risk I'm willing to take.


The above are just my reasons for not wanting the vaccine.

Maybe my reasons make sense to you, maybe they don't.

Whatever does makes sense to you, hopefully we can still be friends.

I for one think there's a lot more that we have in common than what separates us.

  • We all want to live in a world of freedom.

  • We all want to do our part to help others and to live well.

  • We all want the right to express our opinions without fearing we'll be censored or viciously attacked.

  • We all deserve to have the access to the facts so we can make informed decisions.

Agree or disagree with me; I'll treat you no differently.

You're a human just as worthy of love and respect as anyone else.

For that I salute you, and I truly wish you all the best.

I hope you found this helpful.

If so, feel free to share.

If not, feel free to (kindly) let me know what didn't make sense to you and I'd be happy to hear your thoughts too.

Stay curious and stay humble.

Until next time,


PS. If you think I studied this topic well, think about how much thought I would put into helping you with your health. Helping people with their health is what I do all day, every day.

PPS. Health can't be injected, but it can be earned.