Why the Need for Mass Quarantine?
We Isolate the sick, not the healthy
The Economy has never before been shut down during an epidemic, much less the entire world
Original definition: detention and segregation of subjects suspected to carry a contagious disease.
Now it represents a period of isolation for persons or animals with a contagious disease – or who may have been exposed but aren't yet sick.
Recent times quarantine represent a compulsory action enforced by health authorities.
From the 20th to the 24th of January, 2020, the 50th World Economic Forum met in the Swiss city of Davos. At the same time, on January 23rd, China imposed the first lockdown in the history of humankind, and the global avalanche of corona coverage began.
January 2020 Lock Down Re-introduced by XI JINPIN reset-f111d297853c
Just a few days later, WHO Director Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus was already praising China’s method as “precedent-setting.” Almost every country on earth copied China in the following months. In the meantime, Klaus Schwab, executive chairman of the WEF, was looking forward to the once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for a “Great Reset” that he conjured out of his hat in front of the global public in Davos. Each additional day of lockdown brings Big Tech, Big Pharma, and Big Money unbelievable profits.
Nuzzo, senior scholar at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security. “We have little to no evidence that [quarantines] work, and a lot of evidence that they do harm,” Nuzzo said.
CDC continues to endorse quarantine for 14 days and recognizes that any quarantine shorter than 14 days balances reduced burden against a small possibility of spreading the virus,” the agency said.
The incubation period for Covid-19 can be up to two weeks — perhaps even longer in rare cases — suggesting that people can’t say they’re fully in the clear until a 14-day quarantine is up.
Interesting note: The 2009 H1N1 pandemic — commonly referred to as the swine flu, which resulted in more than 60 million cases and more than 12,000 deaths in the United States over a one-year period — did not see a quarantine.
The sheer number of people whose lives have dramatically and irrevocably changed during the forced lockdowns with COVID-19 will affect the mental, financial and physical health of the world for years to come. However, there has been no historical precedence set for a population-wide lockdown.
AFLDS supports an immediate end to the draconian lockdown measures that threaten the food and beverage industry and the millions of jobs it sustains.
Deeper Dive Materials
CALIFORNIA ESSENTIAL WORKERS ARE:
20 MILLION UNEMPLOYED (CA) CAPTIVE AUDIENCE FOR 24/7 MSM PROPAGANDA
ISOLATE, DIVIDE & CONQUER
More Evidence Proves Lockdowns Are a Dangerous Lie
Lockdowns have destroyed businesses, damaged community health and, as recent data show, are not an effective way of reducing the spread of a contagious disease.
Deep Dive Videos
Lockdowns – America's
Harmful Health Effects: Lockdowns are not feasible for seasonal viruses like influenza or Covid-19. In an urban, complex, modern world, shutting down the economy and human life for 1/3 of every year causes exponentially greater downstream harm in poverty, social isolation, depression, alcoholism, delayed and limited access to healthcare resulting in death. In addition drier, uncirculated air of indoor environments encourages viral transmission.
Don’t Work: The most obvious proof that lockdowns don’t work is Sweden (not locked down) whose numbers were better than her European neighbors which did lock down. Furthermore, during the second wave, Sweden’s numbers are much better than its neighbors, implying lockdowns are simply irrelevant, as the virus must just get through the community, and once it does, numbers are low. Even under conditions of extreme (voluntary) lockdown the virus gets through.
"But there has been another cost that we’ve seen, particularly in high schools…We’re seeing, sadly, far greater suicides now than we are deaths from COVID. We’re seeing far greater deaths from drug overdose that are above excess that we had as background than we are seeing the deaths from COVID.”
Important Notes & Ramifications
America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) calls on public health officials to immediately lift arbitrary limits on indoor dining and provide a much-needed economic boost to struggling small business owners and their employees.
Over 110,000 restaurants and bars closed temporarily or permanently in 2020. The damage done to these businesses, without regard to facts or medical science, should also be a catalyst for class action litigation on the part of the food and beverage and hospitality industries.
RESTAURANTS ARE NOT TIED TO OUTBREAKS · Data from the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health revealed that bars and restaurants had been responsible for less than 4% of coronavirus outbreaks there.
Should the technocrats who pushed governments to lockdown their citizens be tried for crimes against humanity?
Hohmann: Calls For Second Nuremberg Tribunal To Try Crimes Against Humanity
March 15 Wall Street Journal reported:
I’ve looked at more than 100 regions and countries. None have seen exponential growth of the pandemic continue until herd immunity was reached, regardless of whether a government lockdown or other stringent measure was imposed. People eventually revert to more-relaxed behavior. When they do, the virus starts spreading again. That’s why we see the “inverted U-shape” of cases and deaths everywhere.
After a year of observation and data collection, the case for lockdowns has grown much weaker. Nobody denies overwhelmed hospitals are bad, but so is depriving people of a normal life, including kids who can’t attend school or socialize during precious years of their lives. Since everyone hasn’t been vaccinated, many wouldn’t yet be living normally even without restrictions. But government mandates can make things worse by taking away people’s ability to socialize and make a living.
The coronavirus lockdowns constitute the most extensive attacks on individual freedom in the West since World War II. Yet not a single government has published a cost-benefit analysis to justify lockdown policies — something policy makers are often required to do while making far less consequential decisions.
If my arguments are wrong and lockdown policies are cost-effective, a government document should be able to demonstrate that. No government has produced such a document, perhaps because officials know what it would show.